How To Use The Floyd Numbers To Gain An Edge
Here is an edited
transcript of a recent TraderTalk interview with David Floyd in which he and TM
Editor-in-Chief Eddie Kwong discuss how David’s Floyd Numbers are used to
identify high-probability reversals.
Brice Wightman: Good afternoon and welcome to TraderTalk.
This afternoon, we are fortunate to have with us high-velocity trader David
Floyd. David is also the mastermind of “The Floyd Numbers.” Interviewing him today is TM Editor-in-Chief Eddie Kwong. Click
here to view the charts for today’s session.
Eddie Kwong:
Hi Dave. How are you?
David Floyd:
Very well Eddie.
Kwong:
Well, I have a few things to ask you about the current market, but I’ll save
that for later.
Let’s just back up a little and look at the big picture.
Floyd:
Sure.
Kwong:
Naturally, the markets have changed dramatically over the past two years. The go-go
days are behind us. Has your approach changed, and if so, how?
Floyd:
It has changed. I have gone back to being far more selective on my entries. In
the go-go days, you could be a bit sloppy and still get rewarded. Those days are
gone. As a result, the number of trades I take is lower, but I have increased my
share size. My skills are even more refined.
My style remains the same, however, buying pullbacks and shorting rallies off a
1-min chart.
Kwong:
That style goes back a number of years I understand. When did you get started?
Floyd:
1994.
I was fresh off a bond trading desk and was ready to tear up the equity world.
Kwong:
That was a different kind of environment from the one in which many newcomers
were exposed to in the late 90s. You probably
learned to operate with a lower volatility and smaller intraday ranges back
then, huh?
Floyd:
Ironically, it was similar to what we have now, perhaps not as subdued, but in
retrospect it was a great environment to learn in, it forced you to trade with a
plan. And yes, the ranges were smaller that in the late 90s.
Kwong:
You learned in a tough environment and therefore you can more readily deal with
the current tough environment.
Floyd:
I believe that is correct. There are
subtle differences now though; it is a bit more challenging.
Kwong:
A lot of traders who have entered this market within the last year or so don’t
have it as easy as we all did in the late 90s. Any advice?
Floyd:
Yes, do not give up. Contrary to what many say, you
can make a living as a
trader. It takes a lot of work and discipline. I have a guy who trades with
me… he is less than a year into this and is making excellent progress. With the
right attitude, learning and environment, it can be done. In fact…
this is probably a great time for new traders to develop the discipline
necessary to be a trader, so that when volatility comes back a bit more, it will
seem much easier.
Kwong:
Let’s talk a bit about the Floyd Numbers. I understand that they are one of your
primary tools.
What are they and how do you use them?
Floyd:
Sure, yes that as well as the KTNs I use for the S&P and
Nasdaq futures….
Kwong:
Those are numbers in your column — the KTNs?
Floyd:
Yes, the KTNs are in my morning column.
So, at any rate…I use the Floyd Numbers (FNs) as a way to identify really above-average setups
intraday.
Kwong:
When you say that you started out reading the tape, I presume you were just watching quotes go across the wires?
Floyd:
More or less, actually watching time and sales, counting the number of shares
hitting the bid or traded on the offer. Surprisingly, just that alone is very
effective but when you combine technicals, it becomes far more effective.
Kwong:
So in doing this, you’re able to develop a sense of which price levels were the
most KEY during the course of the day. Tell me how the FNs differ from just
ordinary support/resistance…Fib…trendlines, etc.
Floyd:
Sure. Frankly, they have come about simply by looking at so many charts over the
years, that you begin to get a sense of what works and what doesn’t…
Kwong:
I
see. But the main thing is….
Floyd:
It is a combination of a few technical disciplines.
Kwong:
The FNs are price levels which you believe have a much greater-than-normal
probability of producing a good trading opportunity…correct?
Floyd:
Yes, provided that a trade setup exists already, let me explain…
Kwong:
Yes…walk us through some trades.
Floyd:
The numbers themselves may not be an absolute support resistance in and of
themselves. However, if you are sitting there trading, let’s say Applied
Materials
(
AMAT |
Quote |
Chart |
News |
PowerRating), because I
have an example of that one (see chart below) and you are considering going long anyways, based on your analysis, and you also
see that a FN corresponds with your entry point, you should consider that trade to be above average.
Essentially you have one other reason
that the trade should pan out.
Kwong:
Do you position yourself bigger? Play it more aggressively?
Floyd: Absolutely, or better yet, let’s say it is a trade that bucks the trend, a trade
I normally never take…
Kwong: Very interesting on
AMAT…I see.
Floyd:
This is a one-minute chart of Applied
Materials
(
AMAT |
Quote |
Chart |
News |
PowerRating) from the gap down session on Wednesday, June 26.,
2002.
This blue arrow
is on loan from Dave Landry, and it clearly shows that the trend is down. Not
exactly the type of chart that gets you really excited to be a buyer…or is it?
On the surface it appears that looking to go long AMAT,
other than on a whim, would be crazy. It is clearly trending down, and as is
seen, there are no valid reasons for a long setup.
Floyd Number
(FN) at 18.62.
With the Nasdaq and S&P futures firming after the big gap down, the trade
was pretty low risk, if you used a protective stop. Normally, without the
knowledge of that support level, it would have appeared as though you were
trying to pick a bottom. In this case, you were making an educated bet. In that case, I actually may take the trade but reduce my share size, now you have
a situation where you are in a trade that normally you would have passed up.
Kwong: You had both FN and a KTN hitting
simultaneously.
The FN hit the stock. The KTN hit the futures?
Floyd:
Exactly. What more do you want for a
setup? Belly up and place the trade.
Kwong:
So you have both AMAT and the S&P futures sitting at support in a market
(Wednesday)
that got crushed on the opening….
Floyd: Not only do you believe there will be a reversal, based on what you are seeing in
terms of price action, but now you have a KTN and a FN letting you know there is
additional support…
worst-case scenario you get stopped out, but the risk- reward is too juicy to
pass up
Kwong:
Looks potent.
So walk me through…you’re sitting there at your monitor. You have your FNs
(for stocks) and your KTNs (for futures) and you’re watching the price action.
The bar unfold minute by minute… price comes down to your FN level. What’s next?
Floyd:
Sure, take a look at these two charts, it gives you a
good way to implement these on your charts. Then I will walk you through.
The first chart, Brocade Communications
(
BRCD |
Quote |
Chart |
News |
PowerRating), shows you an effective way to utilize the FNs by simply drawing them
into your existing 1- or 5-minute chart. This puts the numbers right into
the price action, allowing you to easily see setups.
What I do to
make using the FNs easier is to actually draw them on my 1- and 5-minute
charts. In this case, you would extend the lines out to the right so that they
will be present when tomorrow’s prices populate that chart. The next chart will
show the continuation of June 26, 2002, trading. I also color the lines so that
I know the significance of each one.
So in this case,
we have levels that present us with potential entry points, either on the short
side or long side depending on the overall price action, as well as the futures.
In this case, the Nasdaq futures also hit resistance (KTN) and sold off hard,
giving you the opportunity to short BRCD.
However, factor in a FN on the second chart as well as looking at the S&P
futures (sitting on support, KTN), and
suddenly what was once a crappy setup becomes a trade that offers
potential upside with limited risk, assuming you use a protective stop. That is
the power of using FNs, as well as integrating the futures and their respective KTNs
to come up with a powerful combination.
Notice how I drew the FNs on to my chart, now they are right in the
middle of
the price action for easy reference.
Kwong:
Right.
Floyd:
Getting back to your question…
Kwong:
Will you trade, say…a less potent situation — like if you see a FN along with a
good price pattern, but no corresponding KTN in the S&Ps?
Floyd:
Absolutely
Kwong:
But if you are looking for the “homeruns”…
Floyd:
I’ll even trade without either a FN or KTN
Kwong:
If you are looking for high-probability…
Floyd: Yes, correct, the confluence of those one or
two items gives you the extra edge.
Kwong:
You’re looking for the sweet-spot combo of pattern, FN, KTN, etc.
Floyd:
You got it. That
goes back to how you can adapt in this market.
Kwong: In what sense?
Floyd:
On days when you come across these setups, you need to step up, simply because
the price action is not what it used to be. By varying my share size on a per trade basis, I capitalize
more so when the
trades are above average rather that constantly trading the same share size. That
is how you outperform the market.
Kwong:
So these days…you get fewer
setups, but you know exactly which ones offer the
good risk/reward and you know when to step in heavily…
Floyd:
Yes, 100% correct
Kwong:
OK, let me just ask you to walk us through the Veritas
(
VRTS |
Quote |
Chart |
News |
PowerRating) chart. What’s happened there
and what was your plan of attack?
Floyd:
On the two charts below, again, at first glance, a long setup seems unreasonable. However, once
the FN is factored in, the trade seems more logical.
Floyd:
You always need to be adapting, I was not doing this type of varied bet size
just two years ago. In this case you have a situation where it looks like you are catching knife,
picking a bottom etc., but in actuality you are playing the odds again, support at an extremely
oversold level… on this trade I would have taken it, but in this case lowered my share size
since I am fighting the trend. With out that number (FN) I never would have
taken the trade. That was how I traded before using these FNs.
Kwong:
I guess the one temptation we have is to view FNs as a
stand-alone, but you’re
not saying that, correct?
Floyd: Correct, sure
sometimes they work, but like anything you need further evidence. Use them in conjunction but only with your daytrade setups but also swing trade
setups as well
Kwong:
OK, before we open it to questions.
I realize that it’s dangerous to have an opinion
— or at least a strong
one — but what are your thoughts on the current environment as it relates to trading?
Floyd:
Mixed… I actually think it has been a great year so far, better than last, at least
for me. However, my concern is further erosion of investor confidence. That could really put a
lid on volatility and that would be very bad…. we will just have to see, in the meantime take full advantage.
Kwong:
Agreed… still, the short-term trader doesn’t trade because he’s confident in a
company. He’s just seizing upon a few slivers of price action.
Floyd:
Sure, but without large institutional participation, the price action just won’t be there.
It will be like
summer trading but perhaps slower.
Kwong:
Right, you need the public investor.
Wightman:
Got a couple of questions here for you, David:
Do you use margin?
Floyd: Yes, in fact it is a great tool. The concept is the same as trading off of an
FN. If the trade is good, I want as many shares as I can get that will not present a
problem from a liquidity standpoint, meaning
if the stock has only traded 100,000 all day, I do not want to try to scalp
10,000 shares. My fills will be horrible.
Wightman:
Do you have a rule to determine position size?
Floyd:
It is subjective, and quite frankly you learn to determine what you can and
cannot “move” with a stock, Citigroup for example I can move up to
10,000 shares and not really cause much of a problem. However, a stock like IBM, moving even 1000 shares sometimes is
tough, not because there is not volume, but because of the way the Specialist
trades
the stock.
Wightman:
How many times do you add to a winner?
Floyd:
Rarely. I usually go full force on my first entry. I have that conviction, given
my trades are short-term in nature (<5-min.) I do not have the luxury of
adding… I am confident to go all-out the first time. Sometimes, if I miss my entry point though, and I feel the trade will be a good one, I will
pay up
Wightman:
I’m taking a trial to your service. What’s the best way for me to use it?
Floyd:
First off, don’t be overwhelmed by the number of FNs I put in for each stock. Remember, these are potential areas, your number one objective should be to identify when these FNs correspond with
an existing trade setup you have already identified, and then adjust you size
accordingly. This simple act alone will make you a far more effective trader.
Frankly, of the six to eight numbers I put on each stock each night, only one or two pan
out the next day, but that is all you need.
Wightman:
Is there a way to program FN and KTN formulas into TradeStation?
Floyd:
Currently, no. However, that is the most effective way to use them, having them
on your screen… Unfortunately, many of the numbers are derived the old-fashioned way, eyeballing charts. The other could be programmed in… we will have to come up with a way to upload the numbers to a quote
vendor
server so they can be overlaid on your charts. In the meantime…..simply draw the numbers on to your 1- and 5-minute chart.
Wightman:
David, how often do you use bullets during the day?
Floyd: I use bullets just about
every day, or I may have a conversion on, if I am trading
the same stock every day.
Wightman: What does your service consist of and what time is it updated each night?
Floyd:
The service consists of roughly 20 stocks, 10 NYSE and 10 Nasdaq, naturally the
most active ones… And what I do is provide a range, up to 10 numbers that may offer support or
resistance the following day. I cannot
stress enough the importance of drawing them into your charts. They are usually updated by about 8:00
PM or 9:00 PM EST, and the same time on Sunday for
Monday numbers. Also, it has additional information and commentary on certain stocks that present swing
trades or unusually good setups.
Wightman:
That’s all the questions we have, Dave. Thanks. I’m handing it back over to
Eddie. Eddie?
Kwong:
OK, well, it’s been a pleasure talking with you today, Dave. I learned a lot.
Best of luck with your trading. I’ll be watching the Floyd Numbers tomorrow for
sure. Have a nice evening everybody.
Wightman:
Here’s the link to David’s service.
Try a free trial.
Have a nice evening everybody, and thanks again. https://www.tradingsubscriptions.com/subscriptions/site.cfm?page=sub-flyd-1.
Floyd:
Thanks, Brice and Eddie.
For The Best Trading
Books, Video Courses and Software To Improve Your Trading