Boom and bust: what we can learn from the SOX

Semiconductor stocks (SOX) have been weak of
late, but it’s important to take a step back and recognize that these stocks
have been weak for years now. Let’s go back and retrace the incredible bull and
bear run in these issues and see if we might learn something about the dynamics
of market bubbles and their bursting. Indeed, as we shall see, these phenomena
provide some of the market’s best trading opportunities.

We start in October, 1996. The SOX is trading in the 180s. Six months later, the
SOX had gained 50%, reaching the 290s in February of 1997. By August of that
year, the SOX was trading in the 390’s–a double within a year’s time–before
thudding back to earth in the 240s by the end of the year.

By April, 1998, the SOX is back to the 320s, rising about a third in several
months’ time, before again crashing to the 180s in October of that year.

What we see in the SOX are periods of significant boom and bust that left the
average unchanged over a two-year period. Incredibly, this was
before
the real boom and bust had occurred!
In other words,
the prelude to the bubble and the burst of the bubble was significant
volatility.

Now the bubble begins in earnest. From October, 1998 to January, 1999 the SOX
index doubles in value. A consolidation through May of that year is followed by
another 50% spike higher by September, 1999, leaving the SOX in the 570s. Within
a year’s time, the SOX has tripled in value.

A quick bust in October, 1999 takes about 100 points off the index, but this
ground is retraced–and more–by the end of the month. Then, from October, 1999
to March, 2000, the SOX moves steadily higher to an amazing 1362: well over
doubling in less than half a year’s time. Indeed, in about a year’s time, the
SOX had almost quadrupled in value.

Now came the bust. Just one month later, in April, 2000, the SOX was down to the
870s, an amazing drop of over a third. The average made it back over 1200 by
July of that year–incredible volatility–only to fall back to the 880s later
that month and rise back to the 1100s in September. Then, by November, the SOX
dropped all the way to 516: more than a 50% drop in just two months. We bounced
to the 700s by January, 2001–still significant volatility–but that would prove
the index high that year. In the aftermath of 9/11, the SOX declined all the way
back to the 340s.

And the eventual market bottom? After a vigorous bounce to the 600s in March,
2002 (still phenomenal volatility), we dropped unceremoniously to the very low
200s in October of that year. With that, we had retraced nearly all gains back
to that 1996 beginning.

The SOX bounced nicely after that, hitting 560 in January, 2004. Since then,
levels above 500 have been stymied. Most recently, we peaked in the 530s in
April, 2006 and are now trading in the 420s.

What the SOX tell us is that, even with the bull market of 2002-present, we are
down 2/3 from the market peak in 2000 and down even from that bounce off the
September, 2001 lows. While much of the rest of the market has been in bull
mode–especially the smaller caps–the SOX (and much of its NASDAQ cohorts) has
been unwinding its market bubble.

If the bubble experiences of gold in 1980 and Japan’s stock market in the late
1980s are any indication, it could take years to unwind the incredible run in
the SOX. Indeed, as hard as it may be to fathom, it may well be that we have not
yet seen the ultimate post-bubble lows in many of these stocks.

And the bubble markets of today? We will see them first by their boom-bust
volatility; then by their ramping volume and new highs. As we can see from the
SOX, however, these remain volatile–and potentially profitable–trading
vehicles well after their bull peaks. In their boom-bust behavior, gold (and
other metals) and emerging country stocks are certainly candidates.


An important paper
by Lee and Swaminathan details the momentum lifecycles of
stocks. If you read it carefully, you’ll develop a deep appreciation for how
booms and busts occur–and how you might locate the next ones. Their research
suggests that the high volume big winning stocks of tomorrow are low volume
winning stocks today. After they become high volume winners, their success
continues for a period of months before they crash to earth and become high
volume losers. Only after a considerable period of time in which the stocks
lose favor–and become low volume losers–do they have an opportunity to return
to the beginning of the momentum lifecycle as low volume winners.

Brett N. Steenbarger, Ph.D. is
Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at SUNY
Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, NY and author of


The Psychology of Trading
(Wiley, 2003). As Director of Trader
Development for Kingstree Trading, LLC in Chicago, he has mentored numerous
professional traders and coordinated a training program for traders. An active
trader of the stock indexes, Brett utilizes statistically-based pattern
recognition for intraday trading. Brett does not offer commercial services to
traders, but maintains an archive of articles and a trading blog at
www.brettsteenbarger.com and a
blog of market analytics at
www.traderfeed.blogspot.com
. His book, Enhancing Trader Performance,
is due for publication this fall (Wiley).