# Defining Reward/Risk Ratios With Chart Setups In The Futures Markets

One of the critical tasks traders face is finding setups appropriate to their
risk profile and then making a trading plan for each trade. You can useÂ  common chart patterns to estimate the
reward and
potential risk of a trade. This will give you a quantitative method for analyzing

As most traders know, futures and stocks repeat price movements with
sufficient frequency that the patterns they trace are identifiable, have names
and are tradeable. The fact that price behavior
repeats, allows one to calculate the move a futures isÂ likely to make
once a new pattern setup emerges.Â

The point-value that a futures is likely, or
predicted, to move is called a “measured move.” Research shows that
futures contracts have a high, and statistically significant chance of moving to
the measured objectives in the following pattern setups. The measuring objectives
are conservative for
these pattern setups, but bear
in mind, these are guidelines, not hard-and-fast rules. And of course, honor the
stops.Â

Estimating reward-to-risk ratios is useful because it helps you plan a trade by
determining your entry-point, stop-loss and exit objectives. By establishing your goals for
the trade, you also can determine if the trade provides a suitable return for
your risk tolerance. The reward-to-risk ratio is calculated by taking the price
objective and dividing by the stop (risk), i.e., measuring objective/stop =
reward-to-risk
ratio.Â

My minimum reward-to-risk ratio criteria is 3-to-1.Â

In this lesson, we will look at three common chart patterns: the
head-and-shoulder bottom, the double bottom and the descending triangle.

The calculation of the price objective (reward) and stop (risk) is
straightforward. A long position is entered on the break of the neckline. For
the head-and-shoulders bottom pattern, the measuring objective is twice
the distance from the head to the neckline. The protective stop is placed four ticks below the stop-loss
line and represents the risk. The stop-loss line is created by
drawing a line from the head to the right shoulder.

In the example below in August unleaded gasoline
, the distance
from the head (.7008) to the neckline (.7765) is .0747, giving a measuring
objective of .8522 (.7765 + .0747). The stop is placed four-ticks below the
stop-loss line at .7655 and is equal to .0100. Hence, the reward-to-risk ratio is
.0747/.0100 or 7.5-to-1, a setup which exceeds my 3-1 ratio minimum. The calculation for a head-and-shoulders top is,
of course, the inverse of a head-and-shoulders bottom.Â

Double Bottoms

For double bottoms, the measuring objective is the distance from the bottom of
the double bottom pattern to the resistance level above the double bottoms,
above the “peaks,” if you will. The stop is placed
below the resistance/breakout level and is slightly arbitrary in its
determination. I usually place the stop at a confluence of recent lower highs
and closes below the resistance.Â

In the following setup in September T-bonds
, the distance from
the double bottoms (92 20/32) to the “peak” resistance (94 17/32)
is 61 ticks (94 17/32 – 92 20/32), giving a measuring objective of 96 14/32 (94
17/32 + 61/32, or 1 29/32). The stop chosen below the confluence of recent
lower highs
and closes below the resistance (designated by the oblong circle in the chart),
is at 94 5/32, a distance of 12 ticks. Hence, the reward-to-risk ratio is
61-ticks/12-ticks or 5-to-1. Calculations for double tops can be determined
similarly and also apply to triple top and triple bottom setups.Â

Descending Triangles

For descending triangles, the measuring objective is twice the height
of the triangle, calculated from the high of the pattern to the support, or base,
of the geometric figure. The stop is placed above the descending line of the
triangle (the hypotenuse).Â  Of course these patterns and ratios occur and
can be determined in multiple time frames. The following example is with Nasdaq
100 futures
using 5-minute bars. This example applies to E-mini
Nasdaq 100 futures as well.

In this example, the distance from the high of the pattern (3810.00) to the base (3750.00)
and breakout point is 60.00 (3810 – 3750), giving a measuring objective of 3690.00 (3750.00 – 60.00). The stop and
risk is above the descending line of the triangle at 3770.0 and is equal to 20.00. The
reward-to-risk ratio here is 60.00/20.00, or 3-to-1. Again, this matches my
reward-to-risk requirement.

Notice in the descending triangle example that the NDU0 did not continue
through to the apex of the triangle. Ideally, the futures will breakdown
approximately two-thirds of the way into the pattern. This results in a higher
likelihood of follow-through to the measuring objective. Here, the NDU0 achieved
the measuring objective by the end of the session and traveled nearly that
distance on the following day.

Using chart patterns to calculate reward-to-risk ratios will assist you in
planning your entry, stop-loss and exit points and will keep you from taking