Finding a framework for thinking about markets
Of the many posts to my research blog, TraderFeed,
the one on
what short-term traders need to know has generated the most reader interest.
Not only did it bring significant hits; it also led to many reader comments on
and off the blog. It became clear to me that there is a tremendous latent
interest in the trading world to learn more about how professional traders
assess supply and demand in real time. Intuitively, I believe, traders
recognize that chart patterns, indicator readings, and various calculated market
levels are but dim reflections of actual auction activity occurring on the
screen and in the pits. A more direct reading of trader sentiment and behavior
can be found in the actual moment-to-moment buying and selling activity of
traders and the location of trades within the bid-offer matrix. What we need as
traders is a way of conceptualizing this activity: a coherent framework for
thinking about markets.
Below is a chart of actual buying and selling
activity for 8/10/06, as it appeared in a
recent Trading Markets article. Props to
Market Delta for making these data
available in real time. I’ll use this chart to address many of the questions
that have been posed to me since my blog post and article. In so doing, my hope
is that it opens your eyes to ways of viewing markets that many professional
traders find useful.
First off, a bit of orientation. You’ll notice
price on the Y-axis of the chart and time at the top X-axis. Each bar
represents a five-minute period in the ES futures. The bottom X-axis provides
the total volume for the five-minute bar. Thus we can see volume expand and
contract from bar to bar as markets move up and down. This provides a rough
idea of supply and demand. Note, for instance, that volume expanded on the move
to new lows during the 9:10 CT bar, but then contracted over the next ten
minutes. As the market then rose in the 9:25 CT bar, expanded volume told us
that buyers were taking control, helping us jump aboard that move.
Notice that within the bars, at each time and
price, there are two numbers that are written as “first number X second
number”. For example, in the 9:10 AM CT bar, we can see at 1264.75 the entry
“316 X 0”. That tells us that 316 contracts traded at 1264.75 when that price
was the market bid and 0 contracts traded at that price when it represented the
market offer. When the number of contracts traded at bid exceeds those at the
offer, the line in the bar is coded red. When contracts traded at the offer
exceed those at the bid, the line is blue. The relative amount of blue and red
within each bar provides us with a general sense for whether buyers or sellers
are being more aggressive. Note, for instance, that sellers were quite
aggressive during the 8:35 AM CT bar, but much less so during the next ten
minutes. Buyers recognized this and bid up the market during the 8:50 and 8:55
AM ET bars. Was this an impressive rally? No, we can see that total volume
(bottom X-axis) did not expand on the rise. Sellers no doubt saw that and
helped push the market lower over the next 15 minutes.
Markets begin to make sense when you view them
this way.
If we look at the numbers within the bars
vertically (top to bottom/bottom to top), we can see if volume (and proportion
of volume at the bid vs offer) is expanding as the market is falling or rising.
Look, for example, at that market drop during the 9:10 AM bar. Was volume
expanding as we made new lows? Absolutely not. Were we seeing expanded trade
on the bid? No way. Sure enough, that turned out to be a false breakout to the
downside. No big traders came in to hit the bids, a major, major clue that we
were not going lower.
Now let’s look at vertical volume during the rise
at the 9:25 AM CT bar. Notice what happened at the 1268 price: Volume suddenly
jumped. A closer market analysis on a one-minute Market Delta bar chart
revealed that this jump occurred because large traders (ones trading over 100
contracts at a clip) were lifting offers at that price, responding to the
market’s jump above the prior bar’s high. With volume expanding–and more
volume occurring at the market offer–price moved steadily higher. No false
breakout there!
I like to look at the bars horizontally, as
well. Notice how selling dried up at the 9:15 and 9:20 AM CT bars. Not only do
we see a drop in total volume; as we move from left to right, we see less volume
occurring at the market bid. Sellers are becoming less aggressive over time.
The volume action at 1265.75 going from left to right is a beautiful example of
that. Conversely, note the shift of volume at 1267.75 and 1268 from the 9:15 to
the 9:25 AM CT bars. More total volume and more volume at the offer told us
that buyers were becoming more aggressive over time.
My purpose is not to sell you on this particular
way of viewing markets or on Market Delta as a program. I have no commercial
ties to Market Delta, but I do utilize it in my own trading and find it useful.
What’s most useful, however, is having a framework for conceptualizing
the auction process in the marketplace: the dynamic shifting of interest among
buyers and sellers. That framework helps me understand what is happening from
moment-to-moment in the market and make decisions accordingly. It keeps me out
of bad trades and alerts me to occasions when the market is following
expectations from my market research.
It is not important that you share my
framework, but it is important to have a framework. If
you are looking at simple barcharts and reading oscillator patterns, you are
looking at shadows on the market wall, not the raw data of what is actually
occurring in the market itself. Your framework for those raw data may be Market
Profile, depth of market displays, Market Delta, or something else. The
important thing is to have a way to think about supply and demand that aids you
with decision support in real time. That’s what professional traders have, and
they’re only too happy to take the other sides of our trades when we focus on
price alone and they detect shifting supply/demand.
Brett N. Steenbarger, Ph.D. is Associate Clinical
Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at SUNY Upstate Medical
University in Syracuse, NY and author of
The Psychology of Trading (Wiley, 2003). As Director of Trader
Development for Kingstree Trading, LLC in Chicago, he has mentored numerous
professional traders and coordinated a training program for traders. An active
trader of the stock indexes, Brett utilizes statistically-based pattern
recognition for intraday trading. Brett does not offer commercial services to
traders, but maintains an archive of articles and a trading blog at
www.brettsteenbarger.com and a
blog of market analytics at
www.traderfeed.blogspot.com. His book, Enhancing Trader Performance,
is due for publication this fall (Wiley).Starting 8/21/06, his TraderFeed blog
will offer midmorning analyses of supply and demand and large trader
behavior for the S&P 500 futures market (ES) and related equity indices and ETFs.