Video Course, Parts 1, 2
Video Review
It is
mandatory that you watch my video before you take this online course. The focus
of the online university is the practical application of patterns and
strategies. However, you must master a wide range of critical issues to be able
to achieve long-term success with my strategies.
I
truly believe that there are many intelligent folks who will readily understand
how I trade and I explain all of that, step by step, in the online course. I even
provide an assortment of real-world simulation that will show you how I think as
I watch the market action.
However,
all
of this can only stand on the foundation of material covered
in the video. This includes:
a)
Trading psychology
b)
Money management
c)
Master probability
d)
Etc, etc. etc.
When I look back upon my own history as a trader, I know that I could
know the trading methodology I currently use and still fail–if it weren’t
for these concepts mentioned above.
So…I
repeat please watch the video and work through it using the accompanying
workbook. Then take the online course. The online course will give you an
overview of that material covered in the video and test you on it. Think of the
online course as a study guide that takes you from the classroom into the real
world of trading. After we cover that material — then you are ready the next
step. That is, at that point, we will dig very, very deeply into the strategy
and practical application.
Part
1: QQQ Fundamentals
Let’s start with a
basic review of QQQ fundamentals.
What is the QQQ?
The QQQ (which I’ll often
affectionately refer to as the “Qsâ€) is an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) that
tracks the Nasdaq 100 and is traded on the American and New York Stock
Exchanges. The Qs were launched in
March 1999 and represents underlying equity value of approximately $23 billion.Â
The QQQ is primarily a technology fund, with approximately 66% of the
underlying equities representing the tech sector.Â
Top holdings include MSFT (10%), INTC, QCOM, CSCO, and ORCL, which in
total comprise approximately 30% of the fund.Â
Nasdaq rebalances the fund annually based on a company’s market
capitalization, and recent rebalancing in late 2001 reduced the weighting of the
technology sector while increasing representation in the health care,
bio-technology and consumer fields.
Why Did I change to the
Qs?
As I noted in the video, I made the decision to migrate from trading individual
stocks to the Qs largely because of how stock decimalization in early 2001
negatively impacted my personal trading earnings, which up to that time had been
highly dependent on larger stock spreads and quick market turns.Â
In short, I began to experience my own personal “earnings warningâ€
and quickly realized that I had to reinvent a strategy that would allow time to
work to my benefit without incurring greater risk associated with holding a
non-diversified asset (stock) for a greater period of time.Â
One solution was to migrate to the QQQ which would provide the best mix
of diversification, sufficient price volatility, and market liquidity.
What are some benefits to trading the Qs?
Exploding Volume & ECN Liquidity
There
is no doubt that volume in the Qs has been growing at a rate higher than even
many of their underlying equities. Growing
popularity and access via Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs) such as ISLD,
ARCA and REDI, has stimulated unprecedented trading interest and liquidity, and
the result had been a snowball effect as increased liquidity has driven more
traders to them. As a result, Q
volume has simply exploded since mid-2000.
And while part of the Q
volume surge likely reflects (1) incremental volume to the Nasdaq market in
general and (2) decreasing market prices which can artificially stimulate
volume, comparing relative volumes of the fourth quarter of 2000 to the same
period in 2001 shows marked divergence in Q volume growth vs. that of the
underlying equities. In fact, the
same is true for every quarter, and volume for some equities such as MSFT which
comprises the largest Q component, show noticeable decreases while the Qs
have been exploding – even during a bear market.
No Hidden Market Maker Supply & Demand & Less Prone to Manipulation
Have you ever found yourself correctly positioning for a general market move and
your stock just sits there as Goldman sells and sells and sells into the
strength? Or have you ever been
trapped by the ongoing games on Level 2 where strength appearances truly reflect
weakness? Since the QQQ solely
reflects a proxy price of the underlying equities, market maker games, hidden
supply and demand, and trader manipulation are a thing of the past.
No Uptick Rule
Similar to the futures
market, and because the Qs reflect a composite picture of individual equities,
there is no reason to require upticks for short entries and thus the Qs can be
shortable at any time whether they’re rising or falling.Â
This provides the Q trader with a tremendous advantage over a
stock trader in terms of being able to strategically enter on appropriate
downtrend triggers.
More Effective Risk Management & “Manageable Volatilityâ€
While it’s true that
volatility in terms of price movement provides opportunity for profit,
volatility also brings greater risk which can just as easily lead to losses for
traders who are learning, are undisciplined, or are simply temporarily out of
rhythm. In short, volatility is a
double-edged sword. The Qs on the
other hand provide an effective degree of price volatility that is tempered by
automatic asset diversification.Â
Part 1 Quiz
Q: Which year was the QQQ
launched?
A.   Â
1995
B.   Â
1997
C.  Â
1999
D.   Â
2001
A: C. The QQQ was launched
in March 1999.
Q:Â The QQQ is
an all-technology fund.
A:Â While the
QQQ is comprised mostly of technology companies, approximately 25% of its
underlying equities are related to non-tech sectors including health care,
consumer staples and capital goods.
Q:Â Since the
QQQ reflects a diversified fund, no one company comprises more than 10% of the
tracking stock.
A. False. While it’s true the QQQ
is a diversified fund, Microsoft (MSFT) is heavily weighted and comprises
approximately 12% (as of Q4 2001) of the total QQQ holding value. A weighting
that is roughly twice that of the next largest holding.
Q: Which of the following companies is not represented in the QQQ?
A.   Â
INTC
B.   Â
ORCL
C.  Â
DELL
D.  Â
IBM
A: D. While IBM is indeed a
technology company, it is not represented on the Nasdaq.
Q:Â Short
selling of the QQQ is not allowed.
A. The QQQ
is shortable.
Q:Â T/F The QQQ is not subject to
the short-selling uptick rule.
A:Â True.
Q:Â Which of the following is not a
good reason to consider trading the QQQ?
A.Â
High Liquidity
B. No Volatility
C. Less Subject to Manipulation
D.Â
No Uptick Rule
A. While it’s
true the Qs have less volatility than individual equities, the fund can still be
volatile during times of heavy activity in its underlying equities or in the
Nasdaq futures market.
Part Before we review specific As online trading has grown Myth: Trading is about Reality: Trading is about skill Learning to trade the Qs or Reality: Most folks lose Studies have shown that the Myth: Managing gains Reality: Managing losses While we’ll review gain Myth: The key to successful Reality: Successful trading While good entries are Myth: Trading is about Reality: Every method will We’ll review the concept Myth: We must be able to interpret Reality: Only market reaction The good news (no pun Myth: Reality: News often disrupts In addition to the fact I view trading as a clear business Trading: How much can I Golf: How much can I make Many pursue trading for the Entering a Trade: Trading: How much can I Golf: How can I eagle this While profit potential is a Trading the Qs vs. Trading: Why trade an index Golf: Let’s play that Par Simply put, volatility and
2: Key Trading Concepts
QQQ setups, I feel it’s important to reinforce several key trading concepts,
without which any method, chart or setup would simply cause more potential for
harm than profit. Let’s start by
addressing and dispelling a few myths about this often-misunderstood business.Dispelling Myths
in popularity among brokers, financial publications, cable TV stations, and
traders themselves, I believe there are many myths that surround the industry
that are promulgated to serve interests other than that of the trader
seeking knowledge and guidance. And
as the Qs have generated strong interest among many newer investors and traders,
let’s dispel some of these myths:
making money
development
another market effectively is not unlike studying and learning to become an
airline pilot, surgeon, or professional golfer.Myth:Â
Most folks make money trading
money trading
vast majority (75-85% by some studies) of individuals pursuing trading lose
money, which shouldn’t really be surprising as most small business start-ups
share similar failure rates.
is most important
is most important
management concepts – which are indeed important – shortly, if you don’t
manage your losses, you’ll simply lose the tool which generates your income:
your capital.
trading is good entries
requires effective trade management
indeed key to skew probability in one’s favor, effective trade management
including the handling of one’s emotions and proper use of stops will help
improve profit potential and capital preservation.
finding the best system or indicator
have some probability of success, the probability of each being closer
than you think.
of probability shortly, yet suffice it to say that any method that skews
probability in one’s favor can be equally effective.
news
to news is relevant
intended) as charts and technical analysis reflect trader reaction to news,
thereby eliminating the need for us become interpreters.
News provides high % trading opportunities
natural market rhythms
that trading on news requires trading of multiple markets, news can often
distort normal supply and demand as reflected in charts.Reinforcing the “Skill†Concept
that requires the development of a refined skill over a period of time.Â
I often compare the profession of trading with careers pursued and
achieved by aircraft pilots and surgeons. Yet
perhaps the best way to reinforce the skill concept is to compare the
similarities of trading with another skill field with which many are very
familiar: golfing!Entering the
Business:
make if I start trading the Qs?
on the tour after I start golfing?
income potential without regard to the time and commitment required to develop
and refine the underlying skill.
make on this trade?
Par 4?
necessary component of the trade decision making process, focusing on profit
alone can be like driving the ball as hard as you can for distance with little
regard to precision.
Individual Equities
since stocks have more upside?
5 dogleg with bunkers … better chance to make 3.
its inherent risk can be double-edged.
Managing a Trade Gone Bad
Trading: I can make it back
if I average down
Golf: I can still make 4 if
I hit it through this redwood
Have you ever hit a drive
into the woods? It happens.Â
And what do the best golfers do? They
chip out into the fairway, take the extra stroke and immediately focus on the
next shot.Perception of Other Traders
Trading: No one in my
chatroom is losing money.
Golf: No one else on the
course is struggling.
Do you ever get the feeling
amidst the industry hype and chest-pounding that all of the other traders are
making piles of money? Yet we know
just because you don’t hear screaming or get hit by someone’s club toss on
the course that everyone is playing the same course and facing the same
challenges and struggles you face.
Lack of Individual Responsibility
Trading: I’m going to let
the stock caller do the work.
Golf: I’m going to let my
caddy hit my shots.
Would you prefer that your
caddy hit your shots or simply provide counsel as to various options which can
help you make the ultimate decision, take the shot, and accept appropriate
responsibility? It’s no different
with trading.
Trade & Risk
Management
Now let’s go over a few
trade management fundamentals, including effective entries, exits, use of
protective stops, and incorporating the concept of trade probability.
High Probability Entries
As every QQQ trade entry is
made with the intent of capturing anticipated market movement, let’s review
some attributes of high probability entries:
Align
With Probability
We’ll review the concept
of probability shortly. For now,
suffice it to say that it’s the trader’s goal to be positioned in such a way
where the market will move in a given direction more times than not.
Ensure Sufficient Profit
Potential Exists
What is the risk/reward ratio? Are Knowing the specific Effective use of Stops can be price-based or premise-based. An example of a price-based
you risking $1.00 to make $3.00 or $3.00 to make $1.00?Â
Is your trade likely to run into brick wall of trend support for a larger
timeperiod? Do you have multiple
supports on your side?Minimize Loss Potential
premise for your trade and what it will take to break that premise and trigger a
protective stop are prerequisites for any successful trader.Effective Stops
trade stops is incredibly important in protecting the trader against significant
capital losses. Nothing will put a QQQ trader out of business more quickly
than a blown stop.
stop is exiting when the price movement exceeds a certain amount (e.g., $0.10)
from the initial trade entry. A premise-based stop would be triggered by
chart signals, such as key support or resistance, rather than a specific price.Â
Conversely, premise-based stop exits would be triggered upon a change in the
original trade premise regardless of price, with the objective of not allowing a
stop based on a specific price increment trigger a stop while the premise
remains intact and profit potential still exists.
However defined,
stops should be thought of as a temporary escape to cash to immediately
reassess and reevaluate, with re-entry or reversal should signals dictate.Â
Depending on one’s trading style, re-entry or reversal timing can be
vary from immediately to several time periods later, depending on specific trade
conditions. As such, it may help to
consider the exit to cash to be more of a “yield†rather than a “stop.â€
Stop costs should also be considered a natural and managed cost of doing
business in a profession that depends strongly on the concept of probability to
conquer uncertainty.
Profitable Exits
Have you ever noticed that
few ever assist or encourage you to exit a profitable position?Â
Between analysts with little incentive to issue “sell†ratings,
investors and momentum traders who don’t want to do anything to adversely
affect their position before they exit in the dark of the night, and a
general misconception on “buy and hold†strategies (how long do we hold??),
it’s no wonder why I refer to trade exits as “the trader’s loneliest
decisionâ€.
Suggested exit strategies
include:
Exiting into Supply
Imagine you’re running a
store. Suppose you were selling
merchandise to relieve inventory and a busload of out-of-town customers suddenly
appeared waving their folding money because they simply “had†to buy your
goods. Would you sell to them while
they were physically in the store and willing to fight over your goods and pay a
premium, or after the bus left and you have to not only chase them down
but offer to sell your merchandise at a discount?Â
A similar analogy holds true for purchasing inventory from suppliers.Â
Would you rather buy from suppliers able and highly willing to sell you
inventory at a discount or when they have less incentive and you have to pay
them a premium. Whether you’re
running a store or buying and selling QQQ inventory, the concepts the same.
Resistance Levels
Areas of price resistance
can include larger contra-trend supports and statistical targets such as
Fibonacci figures.
Balancing Gain Maximization and Uncertainty
Since the market is an
uncertain environment at best, attempting to time perfect exits is a clear
exercise in futility and can quickly lead to trader frustration.Â
One way to offset the imprecision inherent in the market is to scale out
of positions at appropriate resistance or statistical target levels, thereby
ridding us of that “perfectionist†demon that can cause havoc in one’s
trading psyche and results.
Low % Trading Times
Staying away from the QQQ
marketplace during times when risk or cost exceeds reward is a key to any
successful trader’s performance. While
“when not to trade†periods can vary based on trader style and area of
specialization, here are some generic low % trading environments when you may
want to consider scaling back or not trading at all.
During Periods of Low Volume or Low
Liquidity
11:00 A.M. – 2:00 P.M. ET
Before/After general market
sessions
Day(s) before or after
Holidays
Prior to the release of key
economic or market-moving news (e.g. FOMC, MSFT earnings)
When Time is Not an Ally
(For Intraday Scalpers)
3:30 P.M. – 4:30 P.M. ET
When There is Insufficient Data
Opening minutes of general
session
Immediately following key
news release
When You Have Less than Peak Trading Focus
When you are fatigued,
stressed or ill
When important family or
business issues are weighing on your mind
Mastering Probability
One indisputable fact in
this or any other business is that no one can predict the future.Â
While this point may seem ridiculously obvious, let me repeat it for
emphasis — no one can predict the future.Â
 And while it
might seem unimaginable to think anything less, many emerging traders seem to
spend day after day searching for that holy grail, crystal ball, analyst, stock
caller, or other device that will rid them of the requirement to operate in an
environment of continual uncertainty.
Perhaps you’ve seen traders who take great pride – perhaps even boast – of the
ability to accurately “predict†a market’s movement. Yet
since no one can predict the future, how can there ever be a right or wrong??Â
Chest pounding or perceived trade “failures†are clear cancers in
this business, as uncertainty prevents there from ever being a right or wrong.
So how do we begin to overcome the challenge inherent in an uncertain
environment? The answer is to seek
a simple bias that skews probability in one’s favor over multiple QQQ trades.
Seeking a Bias
Many folks have commented
on my rather “simple†view of the market.Â
As we’ll review shortly, I trade a single market (the Qs) and use just
three indicators in seeking trade entries:Â
One determines trend (Moving Averages), one defines momentum strength (Stochastics),
and another defines a trading range (Bollinger Bands). That’s it. Three.Â
And one of them (MA) is about as basic as one can get.Â
So why would I choose a rather simple and mundane approach to the markets
when there are multitudes of other indicators available?Â
The answer is that I’m simply attempting to leverage off historically
repeatable pattern biases whose only function is to skew probability in my favor
over time. I view such an approach
analogous to flipping a rigged coin (one that is unfairly weighted toward heads)
time and time again. We know that
the result will be heads much of the time, tails occasionally — including
periodic consecutive attempts – and we really don’t care if any particular
toss comes up heads or tails.
One of the main reasons I encourage newer traders to focus on a single market
such as the Qs is that doing so fosters a suitable environment where trade
probability takes precedent. By
executing multiple trades of the same commodity, equity or market – using a
constant pattern, trigger and stop mechanism –Â
that results in a favorable outcome the more times than not, sample size,
time, and probability will essentially do the heavy lifting.Â
In fact, while top traders continually seek a bias, many will operate
successfully even without such a bias.
Why Win/Loss % Can Be Irrelevant
Over the years, some have
asked for my views on an appropriate win/loss percentage on a trade specific
basis. My response is that while
such a percentage may be a valid measuring stick for certain traders and
methods, there are many styles for which the win/loss concept is totally
irrelevant tool and potentially dangerous if it places focus in the wrong area.Â
For example, an intraday trader who prefers to be have a position in the
market to catch a critical anticipated move can have a ratio far less than 50%
and be highly profitable, as is indeed the case for many world class traders.Â
Consider the following trade sequence for an intraday scalper:Â
In this case, the win/loss % was a mere 33% with net profits of $0.40.
Indeed, one of the great
advantages to trading a single market such as the Qs is that even if you try to
fight the tide for a while, you almost can’t help but tire and then let the
current carry you in the right direction.
Part 2 Quiz
Q:A.Â
Trading is about skill development
B.Â
Most individuals pursing trading as a business lose money
C.Â
Finding the best system is critical ingredient
D.Â
Successful trading requires effective trade management
A:Â There are
many systems of methods which can help skew the probability of trade success in
one’s favor, and effective application of the system is more important than
the system itself.
Q:A.   Â
When there is low market volume
B.   Â
When there is low market liquidity
C.  Â
Immediately following a FOMC interest rate decision
D.  Â
All of the above
E.   Â
A & C
A:Â Periods of
low volume and liquidity typically offer little in price movement and thus
profit potential, and while FOMC decisions are often accompanied by volatility,
much of the movement is often “knee-jerk†in nature and can result in strong
whipsaws before an established trend asserts itself over time.
Q: Which of the following
does not typically describe periods of low QQQ liquidity:
A.   Â
10:00 A.M. – 11:00 A.M. ET
B.   Â
Prior to a FOMC interest rate decision
C.  Â
After the daily general session closes
D.  Â
Week of December 25
A:Â
As a result, the mid-morning period can often provide the best
opportunities of the day.
Q: T/F We don’t need to be able
to interpret news to trade effectively.
A: True.Â
Only market reaction to news as reflected in actual trades and
emerging chart patterns is relevant.
Q: Which of the following
questions should a trader answer before entering a QQQ trade?
A.   Â
What is the premise for the trade?
B.   Â
Where is there resistance if the trade moves in my favor?
C.  Â
At what point do I add to my position if the premise is violated?
D.  Â
All of the above
E.   Â
A & B
A: E.Â
Both a trade premise and an understanding of likely resistance is
important for managing effective trade entries and exits.Â
Adding to a losing position (answer C) if the initial premise is violated
can reflect a sure-fire way to going out of business quickly.
Q: Which of the following
does not accurately fit Don’s definition of a trade “stop�
A.   Â
Necessary
B.   Â
Protective
C.  Â
Permanent
D.  Â
Yielding
A: C. When trading a single
market, a stop can be viewed as an interim insurance policy necessary to protect
a trader against significant capital losses should the initial trade premise be
rendered invalid. Yet the trader
should consider appropriate re-entry opportunities should the premise reappear
and be mentally prepared to do so.
Q: T/F Stops are only
effective if they are tied to a specific deviation (i.e. $0.10 or $1.00) from
your initial entry.
A: False.Â
Stops can be based on a trade premise – such as trend support – which can
fluctuate over time.Q: T/F When placing a new
QQQ trade, the amount of your last stop should be factored into the decision
making process.
A: False.Â
All past trading actions and results – including prior stops or gains –
are totally irrelevant for future decision making purposes.Â
Simply put, one should only be concerned with future market
potential which is in no way linked to your past personal trading activity,
whether negative or positive.
Q: Which of the following
accurately defines effective exit timing for a QQQ trade?
A.   Â
When supply is available
B.   Â
Upon approach to a contra-trend support
C.  Â
All at once
D.  Â
All of the above
E.   Â
A & B
A:Â While C will
be appropriate at times and for some rapid-fire scalpers, scaling out of a
position in portions will help balance the lack of precision that is inherent in
the market.
Q: T/F A trader can only be
successful in trading if his/her win/loss ratio is above 50%.
A: False.Â
Effective loss minimization and gain management can result in net
profitability with trade ratios less than 50%.